Page:Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012.pdf/18

18 Documents seized during raid or in the course of investigation

20. All documents seized during a raid or in the course of investigation and the contents of the documents shall be admissible as evidence.

Evidence of identification of accused or other person

21. Evidence of the identification of an accused or other person prior to the trial shall be admissible as evidence even though the identification was by photographs or other methods or held in circumstances in which the witness identifying the accused or other person is not visible to such accused or other person.

Search list to be admissible as evidence

22. Search list of all documents and things seized during a raid shall be admissible as evidence in court to prove the existence of the documents and things seized that were not produced in court due to the nature of the documents and things.

Non-production of exhibit

23. The non-production of the actual exhibit protected under sections 8 and 11 shall not be prejudicial to the prosecution’s case.

Admissibility of intercepted communication

24. Where a person is charged for a security offence, any information obtained through an interception of communication under section 6 shall be admissible as evidence at his trial and no person or police officer shall be under any duty, obligation or liability or be in any manner compelled to disclose in any proceedings the procedure, method, manner or any means or devices, or any matter whatsoever with regard to anything done under section 6.