Page:Schnarr v. State, 2018 Ark. 333.pdf/17

 Here, appellant testified that he was scared and felt that what he did was reasonable under the circumstances. The jury determined that appellant's actions were reckless, which is incompatible with reasonableness. There was no error in the circuit court following precedent and denying appellant's proffered instructions based on section 5-2-614, and I would affirm on this point.

K, C.J., joins.

Jeff Rosenzweig, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Adam Jackson, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.