Page:Satyagraha in South Africa.pdf/351



Legalization of the marriages celebrated according to the rite of Hinduism, Islam, etc.; The entry of educated Indians; Alteration in the assurance as regards the Orange Free State; An assurance that the existing laws especially affecting Indians will be administered justly, with due regard to vested rights. 

‘If you view my submission with favour, I shall be prepared to advise my countrymen in accordance with the tenor of this letter.’

General Smuts’ reply of the same date was to this effect:

‘I regret but understand your inability to appear before the commission. I also recognize the motive which makes you unwilling to revive old sores by courting libel proceedings before another tribunal. The Government repudiates the charges of harsh action against the Indian strikers. But as you will not lead evidence in support of those allegations, it would he futile for the Government to lead rebutting evidence in vindication of the conduct of its officers. As regards the release of Satyagrahi prisoners, the Government had already issued the necessary orders before your letter arrived. In regard to the grievances summarized at the end of your letter, the Government will await the recommendations of the commission before any action is taken.’

Mr Andrews and I had had frequent interviews with General Smuts before these letters were exchanged. But meanwhile Sir Benjamin Robertson too arrived at Pretoria. Sir Benjamin was looked upon as a pqpular official, and he brought a letter of recommendation from Gokhale, but I observed that he was not entirely free from the usual weakness of the English official. He had no sooner come than he began to create factions among the Indians and to bully the Satyagrahis. My first meeting with him in Pretoria did not prepossess me in his favour. I told him about the telegrams I had received informing