Page:Santos-Zacaria v. Garland.pdf/6

Rh to filing her petition with the court, she had not satisfied §1252(d)(1)’s exhaustion requirement.

There is disagreement among the Courts of Appeals concerning the two issues presented in this case: (1) whether §1252(d)(1)’s exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional, and (2) whether §1252(d)(1) requires seeking discretionary administrative review, like reconsideration by the Board of Immigration Appeals. We granted certiorari to resolve these conflicts. 598 U. S. ___ (2022).

Section 1252(d)(1) provides: “A court may review a final order of removal only if … the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.” The first question before us is whether this provision ranks as jurisdictional. We hold that it does not.

A “jurisdictional” prescription sets the bounds of the