Page:Sanskrit syntax (IA cu31924023201183).pdf/96

 80 § 106-108. CHE » where there is found no [other] death but the god with the flowery arrows [no other Måra but Mâra - Kâma]." = In Patanjali I have met with some instances of a rather pleonastic idiom, the neuter with abl. = »but for" put before the ablat, though the adj. precedes, f. i. Pat. 1, 270 szat faditu; azrat magneran 3 (what else ought to accompany it, if not line 2; p. 447, line 4; p. 323, line 6. (ep. Greek daad, and such phrases confirmed by its being named among f (Kâç. I, p. 17, line 10). this preposition), ep. p. 445, This adverbial use of as oudèv žλλo.... daa' ) is the nipatas in the gana (I Rem. 4. Câk. VII gaan: affattaquauminat do not hold myself for deserving the extraordinary honour be- stowed upon me by Indra) is an instance of this abl. with the negative (not fit); the abl. would be impossible here, but Guyan for the negation. 107. In the archaic and epic dialect an instrumental of comparison Instru- is sometimes used instead of the ablative. So R. 2, 26, 33 gruf: mental instead of ara, ibid. 2, 48, 36 afe mfant sfà at. har (he was to these women even more than their own sons), comm. ga: à: f, ib. 1, 54, 15 mdër: fasanta: compa- Rem. Such passages as R. 6, 24, 28 set sofiant : adal- qu: (and in archery L. even exceeds king K.), Panc. 28 [and rison. R. 1, 47, 22], Panc. IV, 7 anfaa (any woman else but I) show that even a genitive of comparison has been used, Geni- tive of of com- faun pari- son. 1 108. The ves in ⁰: In the foregoing the ending has been considered ablati- as if it possessed the full worth of the regular case- endings of the ablative. Yet a full and complete iden- tity between them may alone be stated for the pro- nouns. Pånini gives some rules about T affixed to nouns, which show that its sphere of employment, though mostly coinciding with that of the ablative, is someti- mes a different one. lly With an and Te it is forbidden to express the whence" P.,6, 3, 7.