Page:Sanskrit syntax (IA cu31924023201183).pdf/54

 38 § 50-52. favoran plat anderutan cansar: active forcat ptaki avid- nalmultan cansar (R. has killed the unhappy Parv. by means of a vishakanyd). The latter type appears to be rare'), the former is the general one and is applied even in such cases, as would not admit of two accusatives in the active form. 51, Sen Examples of type 1. Mudr. VII, p. 222 sat à nuôá Aud Afan, Kull. on M. 8, 287 at Had 2441 au-îa: (he must be caused to pay as much as has been expended), Daç. 164 e mistante congumfanns (Koçadása made me enjoy a bath, food etc.), Hitop. 96 [sc.]: un fi (then he [the hare] commanded the chief elephant to make his pro. stration), R. 2, 62, 1 na: 24. - S Example of type 2. Mâlav. I, p. 15 ulasaña suañar an gràd fan: (v. a. His Majesty, indoed, has it in his own power to make me release Madhavasena). When having got a more or less figurative sense, the causatives may change their construction, So with a (to show) and auf (to tell) the person who is caused to see and to hear is sometimes put in the acc. as attending on a causative, but it is more com- mon to use the gen. or dat., because they in fact range with the verbs of showing and telling. So auf and its compounds are never construed with the acc. of the person to whom something is made known. Accu- sative 52. The accusative of the object is not restricted to the finite verbs, but affects also some active verbal forms, which are grammatically classed among the nouns. In the first place all participles, gerunds and infinitives with ac- nouns. tive signification must have their object put in the accusa- de- pend- ing ou 1) Apart from the two examples adduced in the context I do not remember having met with any. In both of them the object and the agent are persons.