Page:Sanskrit syntax (IA cu31924023201183).pdf/50

 34 § 46-47. conquers a kingdom); as well for (he teaches his pupil) as (he teaches the law). By combining both constructions we obtain 1. at afm rav4; 2. ný fráú aufà; 3. fànci vingamia. This double object may attend a.) verbs of spea- king, as etc., asking, as of af, and sim., teaching, especially Mit and, b.) some others, especially STAA (to win), GIF (to milk), GUYA (to punish, to fine). See P. 1, 4, 51 with the commentaries. aktail and andere ad Examples: speaking: Nala 1,20 R. 2, 52, 31 asking, begging: Ch. Up. 5, 3,5 Tsary: ventaura (that fellow of a rájanya asked me five questions), M. 8, 87, Kathâs. 1, 31 an (he requested a boon of me), Mhbh. 1, 56, 24 your mat quite (I do not beg gold of you, my king, uor silver, nor cows); teaching R. 2, 39, 27 - f atestat azganted (I will do all that, which Mylady enjoins me to do); f: Mhbh. 3, 59, 5 Fourfuta fara
 * Kumar. 1, 2 af tota

ked from the earth resplendent gems and herbs of great medi- cinal power); M. 3, 234 rua (he should punish them with a fine of a thousand paņa). Rem. Indian grammar adds to them some others, instances of which construed with a double object are scarcely met with in literature, if at all. Of the kind are a (to gather), (to check), (to rob), (to churn), thus exemplified; affà nou Mamut as I qui aìyfafú zgılà etc, ¹). TA 47. Yet, with none of the said verbs the double accusative is of necessity. Other constructions are quite as usual, sometimes even preferable, especially in simple prose. L $ 3 1 44 (they mil- B 1) Here also vernacular grammarians put the two accus., depending on such verbs, as. , see 40 R. 1 1