Page:Sanskrit syntax (IA cu31924023201183).pdf/213

 § 260-262. THAT ceded by some pronominal prefix, viza, dallald, Hald. and a point at somebody absent, but the al is always present, so the former two cannot refer but to a 3d per- son, but may denoto as well the person spoken of as the person addressed. Utt. I, p. 1 the director thus addresses the spectators .... nifanfarenfı Qazaham faigh, but Çak. VII Dushyanta when speaking of Çakuntalâ says à à4a- Hart herkent. 261. For the third person Sanskrit does not possess a Third how ex- person, proper personal pronoun, like our he, she, it. Its duties pressed, are discharged by demonstratives. When wanted to be emphasized, by, , , otherwise by the obli- gaą, que cases derived from the pronominal roots, 47, , or what is practically the same, in the acc. by eau, ealų, ead, plur. Cl, Gi, pallot, in Qalla, the other cases by the forms belonging to. The nomin. is not expressed but with some emphasis. See 274. 262. The possessive pronouns are relatively less used than Possess- ive the genitives of the personal ones. One will oftener pro- nonus. meet with 7 or (a shashthísamása 2 197 216, 1°) than R 77 The difference, which exists in English between my and mine, your and yours etc., is not known in Sanskrit; 4614 or 44 96-4¶ may be as well ,my book” as „a book of mine," also the book is mine;" Teri of course cannot have the last meaning, for subject and predicate are by necessity unfit for being compounded.. Rem. 1. Apart from the regular possessives of the 21 person , there exists also Haalu and