Page:Sanskrit syntax (IA cu31924023201183).pdf/171

 0 § 215 216. genaut or ET: or. As this type is met with on every page, it is useless to quote instances from litera- ture. Another frequent type is that, represented by 216. Pane. 118 graga: — Thàangata:, ibid. V, 93 adet: (seized by the prince of giants), Bhojapr. 7 №sf dalanud asted sa va za d For the rest, any noun-case may become the former part of a tatpurusha, as heutu: = Arà heyTUT: (happy for a month), MAHEN: = AA or AJ AZA: (resembling his mother), = (wood for T a sacrificial stake), il or (fear of a wolf or of wolves), T arr 404 Fallout (cooking in a pot). Yet, there are some restrictions. For this reason, Pânini when treating of compounds made up of a noun-case + noun, gives a detailed account of them. The summary of which runs in this way: The former I. As a rule, any genitive may be compounded (shashihisam- P. 2, 2, 8. member is a genitive. asa). Some cases are excepted. Among others it is not allowed 155 Supe to use compounds, made up of a genitive a participle or a ge. P. 2, 2, 11. rund or a ketya or an infinitive, nor those consisting of a geni- tive + comparative or superlative or ordinal noun of number, nor such as where a genitive is compounded with some noun in % or. Therefore, such phrases as yeni qran; (the most heroic P. 2, 2, 15. of men), ut q: (the fifth of the disciples), wat wer (the creator of the waters), or an or any of any (doing etc. for the benefit of a brahman) are unfit for compound. ing. Partitive genitives are likewise excluded, nor is the dative- like genitive (129), it seems, as a rule, fit for being compounded. —