Page:Sanskrit Grammar by Whitney p1.djvu/193

 a. The future participle may form in nom. etc. dual neuter either or ;, either  or ;  (√), either  or. And, in nom. etc. plural neuter, may make also (beside, as given in the paradigm above).

b. But these strong forms (as well as, du., and its like from present-stems in unaccented ) are quite contrary to general analogy, and of somewhat doubtful character. No example of them is quotable, either from the older or from the later language. The cases concerned, indeed, would be everywhere of rare occurrence.

448. The Vedic derivations from the model as above given are few. The dual ending is only one sixth as common as. Anomalous accent is seen in a case or two:, , and (if this is a participle). The only instance in V. of nom. etc. pl. neut. is, with lengthened (compare the forms in , below, 451 a, 454 c);  one or two examples in  are quotable from B.