Page:Sacred Books of the East - Volume 2.djvu/47

xliv offences against the rules of internal and external Sandhi, e.g. in, I, 4, 12, 8; in  , I, 11, 31, 22, the irregular absolutive of   or of   in  , I, 1, 2, 13; in  , I, 1, 2, 21 ; and in  , I, 6, 19, 8; the neglect of the rule requiring   in the first syllable of the name  , I, 10, 28, 1; the irregular instrumentals  , I, 11, 30, 3, for  , and  , II, 7, 16, 2, for   the nominatives dual  , I, 7, 20, 6, for  , and  , I, 5, 17, 36 for °  and the potentials in  , such as  , I, 1, 2, 28;  , I, 2, 6, 3, &c.

Among the words mentioned by Pânini, but not traced except in the Dharma-sûtra, may be enumerated the verb, to do damage, I, 11, 31, 9; the verb  , to sneeze, from which  , I, 5, 16, 14, and  , II, 2, 5, 9, are derived; and the noun  , I, 9, 24, 6; II, 4, 8, 5, in the sense of a student of the Veda. Words offending against rules given by Pânini, without being either archaic or Prakritic, are e.g., I, 6, 18, 33, one who eats anybody's food, which, according to Pânini V, 2, 9, should be    , I, 5, 17, 39 ;  , a cook, II, 3, 6, 16;  , righteous, for  , I, 2, 7, 21, and elsewhere;  , a gambler, II, 10, 25, 13, for  , the very remarkable form  , I, 1, 4, 1, for  , finds an analogy in the Vedic   for   and in Pali,   from   for   and the curious compounds  , I, 1, 2, 38,  , II, 5, 10, 11, where the first parts show the forms of the nominative instead of the base, and  , I, 3, 11, 31, which as a copulative compound is wrong, though not without analogies in Prakrit and in later Sanskrit. The irregular forms caused by the same tendencies as those which effected the formation of the