Page:Sackett v. EPA (2023).pdf/6

6 falls short of establishing the sort of “overwhelming evidence of acquiescence” necessary to support its argument in the face of Congress’s failure to amend §1362(7). Finally, the EPA’s various policy arguments about the ecological consequences of a narrower definition of “adjacent” are rejected. Pp. 25–27.

, delivered of the Court, in which, and , , and , joined. , filed, in which , joined. , filed concurring in the judgment, in which  and, joined. , filed concurring in the judgment, in which, , and , joined.