Page:Robertson panel report.pdf/17

Approved For Release 2001/08/07-CIA0RDP81R00560R000100030027-0

The Panel Members were in agreement with O/SI opinion that, although evidence of any direct threat from these sightings was wholly lacking, related dangers might well exist resulting from:

a. Misidentification of actual enemy artifacts by defense personnel.

b. Overloading of emergency reporting channels with false information ("noise to signal ratio" analogy--

c. Subjectivity of public to mass hysteria and greater vulnerability to possible enemy psychological warfare.

Although not the concern of CIA, the first two of these problems may seriously affect the Air Defense intelligence system, and should be studied by experts, possibly under ADC. If. U.F.O.'s become discredited in o. reaction to the flying saucer scare, or if reporting channels are saturated with false and poorly documented reports, our capability of detecting hostile activity will be reduced. Dr. Page noted that more competent screening or filtering of reported sightings at or near the source is required, and that this can best be accomplished by an educational program.

The map prepared by ATIC showing geographic locations of officially reported unexplained sightings (1952 only) was examined by the Panel. This map showred clusters in certain strategic areas such as Los Alamos. This might be explained on the basis of 24-hour watchful guard and -17- Approved For Release 2001/08/07-CIA0RDP81R00560R000100030027-0