Page:Request for Official AASHTO Approval to Remove I-296 Route Designation from All References While Retaining the Route as Part of the Interstate System.pdf/2

Mr. Henrik K. Stafseth Page 2 June 22, 1979 The attached letter of April 11, 1979, from the FWA's Office of Traffic Operations indicates the FHWA's position on the matter. Our department wholly agrees with the FHWA position to remove all I-296 references. We will remove all I-296 designations if the existing 3-mile section of US-131/I-296 could continue to remain officially as part of the interstate system. This would allow interstate funding to be applied to future upgrading projects along this roadway.

We are not aware of any regulations or policy statements which could be interpreted to prohibit the removal of all highway and map references to I-296 or where such removal would have any bearing on the retention of this route as part of the interstate system. Furthermore, the AASHTO policy on marking interstate highways in urban areas states they should "be carefully marked for the safety and convenience of the motoring public..."

Therefore, the Michigan Department of Transportation is requesting the approval of the AASHTO Executive Committee to remove all I-296 references while retaining the route as part of the official interstate system. It is felt that the I-296 designation removal in conjunction with the Positive Guidance Demonstration Project will significantly improve both the safety and operational characteristics in the vicinity of the I-96/US-131 interchange.

Sincerely,

John P. Woodford Director

Attachments T&S:WHO (324890-496)-3