Page:Reed v. Goertz.pdf/2

2 DNA testing procedures denied Reed due process would “amount to a significant increase in the likelihood” that Reed “would obtain relief that directly redresses the injury suffered.” Utah v. Evans, 536 U. S. 452, 464. Second, Texas’s invocation of the State’s sovereign immunity fails because the Ex parte Young doctrine allows suits like Reed’s for declaratory or injunctive relief against state officers in their official capacities. 209 U. S. 123, 159–161. Third, Reed’s procedural due process claim does not contravene the Rooker–Feldman doctrine. Pp. 3–4.

, delivered, in which , and , , , and , joined. , filed. , filed, in which , joined.