Page:Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, vol. 26.djvu/116

30 1. There is a great cnemial crest and a ridge for the fibula.

2. The disposition of the distal end of the tibia is literally that observed in the bird.

3. There is a fossa for the reception of the ascending process of the astragalus.

4. The distal end of the fibula is much smaller than the proximal, though not so slender as in Aves. It cannot articulate with the astragalus in the precise way observed in Reptiles.

5. The astragalus is altogether similar to that of a bird, with a short ascending process. I suspect that the perforation observed in this process in Lælaps by Prof. Cope, is the opening of a canal or canals for tendons, as in the fowl.

6. The astragalus appears to have remained distinct from the tibia throughout life in Megalosaurus; but it seems to have become ankylosed in Compsognathus, and Prof. Cope describes it as ankylosed in Ornithotarsus. I believe I have evidence of the same coalescence in Euskelosaurus.

I find that the tibia and the astragalus of a Dorking fowl remain readily separable at the time at which these birds are usually brought to table. The cnemial epiphysis is also easily detached at this time. If the tibia without that epiphysis and the astragalus were found in the fossil state, I know not by what test they could be distinguished from the bones of a Dinosaurian. And if the whole hind quarters,