Page:Psychopathia Sexualis (tr. Chaddock, 1892).djvu/11



distinguished author of "Psychopathia Sexualis" speaks for himself and his work in its preface; but there are not wanting others to speak for him.

Dr. A. von Schrenck-Notzing, of Munich, writes :— "It may be questioned whether it is justifiable to discuss the anomalies of the sexual instinct apart, instead of treating of them in their proper place in psychiatry. As a rule, they are certainly only symptoms of a constitutional malady, or of a weakened state of the brain, which manifest themselves in the various forms of sexual perversion.

"Moreover, attention has been directed to the baneful influence possibly exerted by such publications as 'Psychopathia Sexualis.' To be sure, the appearance of seven editions of that work could not be accounted for were its circulation confined to scientific readers. Therefore, it cannot be denied that a pornographic interest on the part of the public is accountable for a part of the wide circulation of the book. But, in spite of this disadvantage, the injury done by implanting knowledge of sexual pathology in unqualified persons is not to be compared with the good accomplished. History shows that uranism was very wide-spread long before the appearance of 'Psychopathia Sexualis.' The courts have constantly to deal with sexual crimes in which the responsibility of the accused comes in question.

"For the physician himself, sexual anomalies, treated as they are in a distant manner in text-books on psychiatry, are in greater part a terra incognita. Exact knowledge of the causes and conditions of development of sexual aberrations,

(vii)