Page:Protestant Exiles from France Agnew vol 1.djvu/108

 . The government of England had ordered every attention to be paid to him. “Haste, haste, haste, haste, with all haste — vii. of the clocke in the morning,” were the words written on the cover enclosing the despatch (signed Rowland Mekly), sent to Lord Cobham at Cobham Hall, who was Lord Warden and Admiral of the Cinque-ports. Lord Cobham, besides attending to his own duties in the matter, forwarded the Despatch to Mr. Secretary Cecil. On the ioth inst., it was announced that the illustrious visitor “was, at Canterbury, being accompanied with thirtye persons; of best accompte is Monsieur de Lygy.” He proceeded by land to Gravesend, and thence by water to London. On the 13th, Sir Thomas Gresham announced that “my Lord Cardinall Chastillon arrived at the Tower wharf at 4 ” Royal authority in those days made great demands upon the nobility for entertaining strangers at their country mansions. The Bishop of London [Grindal] was excused on account of the scantiness of his furniture. There is in the State Paper Office a long letter, interesting to lovers of house-holding and house-keeping antiquities, in which Lord Buckhurst explained apologetically that having received only very short notice, he had entertained the Cardinal and the Bishop [of Aries] in very plain style at his country seat at Shene (30th September 1568).

Queen Elizabeth received the noble Frenchman as a Prince, lodged him in Sion House, and gave him audiences on Huguenot affairs. Dressed in black flowing garments, and conspicuous with his noble brow and venerable aspect, he was always treated by our Queen with demonstrative affection as one of her intimate friends — so much so, that the Londoners declared that the ambassador from the Prince of Conde was a greater man than the veritable French Ambassador. As he was always styled the Cardinal de Chatillon, the English were not certain as to his creed, and cautiously designated him “a favourer, if not a member, of the Protestant Church.” But inquirers knew his decided profession, his Protestant chaplain, and his worship in Protestant Churches. In the beginning of 1571, during the interval of treacherous tranquillity in his native country, his friends in France summoned him home. He set out for Hampton Court to report himself to our Queen at a farewell audience.

His last appearance in public was on the occasion of our queen’s visit to the Royal Exchange in February 1571 (n.s.). An unaccountable and depressing indisposition seized him. He proceeded as far as Canterbury, and there, in the house of Mr. John Burgey, he died about the 14th of March. Though poison was suspected, the criminal who administered the poisoned apple did not confess the deed until more than a year afterwards. At the time all that could be said is preserved in our State Papers. “2d March 1570. — Sir H. Killigrew could not see the Cardinal, who was indisposed, but Mrs. Walsingham saw his wife in the evening; it appeared that his sickness is not without danger, the rather for that in his conceit it is accompanied with much melancholy.” Canterbury, Friday, 30th March 1571, was the date of the report from Mr. Roger Marwood and Mr. Thomas Leighton, after conference with the widow regarding the cause of the death of the Cardinal of Chastillon. Her opinion was that some sudden illness had seized him in London on the occasion of the queen’s visit to the Royal Exchange, after which his health seemed to fail, he complaining of a burning greife at his stomake. On a post-mortem examination a certain unnatural spot was found in the inner part of his stomach, but after examining persons as had access and were doing about him, suspicion could be attached to none.

Odet de Chatillon lies buried in Canterbury Cathedral — the spot is described in Dart’s History of the Cathedral, as being “at the feet of Bishop Courtney, between two of the pillars bending circularly.” It is marked by “a plain tomb of bricks, made like a round-lidded chest, or not much unlike a turf grave, but higher, and composed of bricks plastered over and painted with a lead colour.”

The Bishop of Winchester (Robert Horn) wrote to Henry Bullinger of Zurich, from London, August 8, 1571 — “The Cardinal, a nobleman of first rank, a pious man and an exile here among us for the sake of religion, while he was sojourning some days at Canterbury, waiting for a wind for his prosperous and safe return, was taken off (as they report, and is indeed credible) by the deadly poison of the Papists, and wasted away, destroyed by wickedness and crime.”   Jean de Ferrières, Seigneur de Maligny, was the son of Francois (or Jean?) de Ferrières and Louise de Vendôme. Through his maternal ancestry, he was cousin and heir of Francois Vendôme, Vidame of Chartres. 