Page:Protection from Harassment Act 2014.pdf/20

20 section 7) to any related person specified in the order, where the victim or the related person was outside Singapore when the respondent did any thing prohibited by the order, the court shall have jurisdiction if the respondent was in Singapore when he did that thing.

(9) In the case of an order prohibiting the respondent from doing any thing in relation to the victim or in the case of a contravention of section 7) to any related person specified in the order, the court shall have jurisdiction—
 * (a) where the respondent was outside Singapore when he failed to comply with an order prohibiting him from doing any thing in relation to the victim, if—
 * (i) the victim was in Singapore when the thing done by the respondent in contravention of the order was heard, seen or otherwise perceived by the victim; and
 * (ii) the respondent knew or had reason to believe that the victim would be in Singapore at the time referred to in sub-paragraph (i);
 * (b) where the respondent was outside Singapore when he failed to comply with an order prohibiting him from doing any thing in relation to any related person specified in the order (in the case of a contravention of section 7), if—
 * (i) the related person was in Singapore when the thing done by the respondent in contravention of the order was heard, seen or otherwise perceived by the related person; and
 * (ii) the respondent knew or had reason to believe that the related person would be in Singapore at the time referred to in sub-paragraph (i); and
 * (c) where the respondent was outside Singapore when he failed to comply with an order prohibiting him from publishing or continuing to publish any communication, if—
 * (i) the communication was heard, seen or otherwise perceived by a section of the public in Singapore; and