Page:Philosophical Review Volume 3.djvu/191

] and of altering their places in his scheme of dialectical development. This is the task to which one who calls himself a Neo-Hegelian must now address himself. We have had enough and to spare of Kantian Epistemology. Let the distinctive problems of philosophy be now attacked. It is a pity that there seems to be no one to do for Hegel what Professor Caird has so ably done for Kant. Let writers say what they may, the philosophy of the future cannot but be a development of Hegelianism in the light of modern science.