Page:Philosophical Review Volume 2.djvu/180

166 another to say that we, through reflection on experience, cannot come to a consciousness of these forms. Kant never clearly distinguished between these very different positions. Hence his contention that a theory of the a priori must itself be a priori, and so, absolutely complete and necessary.

The critical problem then is to be solved precisely like any other problem. Whatever his intention, Kant solved it by means of hypotheses, which, as they originated in reflection, must also be brought to the test of reflection for their verification. There are a priori synthetic judgments; here are hypotheses to explain them. We have seen reasons to doubt the existence of such judgments. But we are not on that account altogether excused from an examination of the conditions Kant has found for them, since these, as we saw, are not only intended to explain but to some extent also to justify a priori knowledge. Neither, on the other hand, should any pretensions to infallibility of method or finality of results debar us from examining Kant's solution of the critical problem with the utmost freedom. But all this must be reserved for later articles.

Editor.