Page:Open access and the humanities - contexts, controversies and the future.pdf/195

 Michel Foucault, ‘What Is Enlightenment?’, in Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984 (London: Penguin, 2000), pp. 303–19 (p. 316).

Carlos J. Alonso and others, Crises and Opportunities: The Futures of Scholarly Publishing, 57 (American Council of Learned Societies, 2003), p. 2 www.acls.org/uploadedﬁles/publications/op/57_crises_and_opportunites.pdf [accessed 2 May 2014].

Hall, Digitize This Book!, pp. 59–61.

Domenic V. Cicchetti, ‘The Reliability of Peer Review for Manuscript and Grant Submissions: A Cross-Disciplinary Investigation’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14 (1991), 119–35.

I owe the phrase ‘genealogies of validation’ to Martin McQuillan.

Peter Binﬁeld, ‘Open Access MegaJournals – Have They Changed Everything?’, Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand, 2013 http://creativecommons.org.nz/2013/10/open-access-megajournals-have-they-changed-everything/ [accessed 28 November 2013]; Damian Pattinson, ‘PLOS ONE Publishes Its 100,000th Article’, EveryONE, 2014 http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2014/06/23/plos-one-publishes-100000th-article/ [accessed 24 June 2014].

PLOS, ‘PLOS ONE Journal Information’ www.plosone.org/static/information [accessed 6 May 2013].

Clay Shirky, ‘It’s Not Information Overload. It’s Filter Failure’ (presented at the Web 2.0 Expo, New York, 2008) http://blip.tv/web2expo/web-2-0-expo-ny-clay-shirky-shirky-com-it-s-not-information-overloadit-s-ﬁlter-failure-1283699 [accessed 1 May 2014].

Willinsky, The Access Principle, p. 203. Note that Biagioli (‘From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review’) argues that peer review developed at an earlier stage than the conventionally held point of the Transactions and has roots instead in the seventeenth-century book trade.

Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, p. 196.

Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, pp. 110–12, 192.

Palgrave Macmillan, ‘Introduction’, Palgrave Macmillan: Open Peer Review Trial http://palgraveopenreview.com/introduction/ [accessed 4 April 2014].

Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, p. 192.

A good example of such pragmatism is evinced in Gordon M. Sayre, ‘The Crisis in Scholarly Publishing: Demystifying the Fetishes of Technology and the Market’, Profession, 2005, 52–8. I do not agree with all that Sayre says but his method of establishing what we need and want, while shying from a fetishisation of technology-for-technology’s-sake is worthwhile.

Ginsparg, ‘Winners and Losers in the Global Research Village’.