Page:Open access and the humanities - contexts, controversies and the future.pdf/192

 Jennifer Crewe, ‘Scholarly Publishing: Why Our Business Is Your Business Too’, Profession, 2004, 25–31 (p. 25).

By which I mean that the typesetting is done digitally and print is derived from this same source.

For more on these costs in the journal sphere, see Brian D. Edgar and John Willinsky, ‘A Survey of Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems’, Scholarly and Research Communication, 1 (2010) http://srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/view/24 [accessed 1 May 2014].

Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, ‘OAPEN-NL’, p. 3.

Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, ‘OAPEN-NL’, p. 68.

Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, ‘OAPEN-NL’, p. 67.

Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, ‘OAPEN-NL’, pp. 55–7; Swan, ‘The Open Access Citation Advantage’.

Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, ‘OAPEN-NL’, pp. 40–53.

Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, ‘OAPEN-NL’, p. 83.

OAPEN-UK, ‘The Pilot’, 2013 http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/pilot/ [accessed 25 March 2014]. There is some confusion around the numbers here. Technically, there were 29 original matched pairs (yielding 58 titles), which were then to be joined by a further 18 pairs from Oxford University Press (adding a further 36), making a total of 94. However, four titles remain listed as ‘TBC’.

Disclosure of interest: I am a member of the OAPEN-UK project’s steering group.

See Susan Brown and others, ‘Published Yet Never Done: The Tension between Projection and Completion in Digital Humanities Research’, 3 (2009) http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/2/000040/000040.html [accessed 3 May 2014] for an introduction on the issues of versioning and completion that often inhere in digital humanities projects. Note well, however, that despite the lack of print materiality, this sphere is less delineated from traditional writing than might be supposed; is a piece of writing ever ﬁnished, or merely committed as a speciﬁc version to the page? I’d suggest the latter.

OAPEN-UK, ‘Year 1 Focus Group Summary Report’, 2012, p. 1 http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/research-ﬁndings/y1-initial-focus-groups/ [accessed 25 March 2014].

OAPEN-UK, ‘Year 1 Focus Group Summary Report’, p. 3.

Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, pp. 122–3.

Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, p. 124.

Donald J. Waters, ‘Preserving the Knowledge Commons’, in Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, ed. Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007), pp. 145–67.

OAPEN-UK, ‘Researcher Survey’, 2012 http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/research-ﬁndings/researchersurvey/ [accessed 25 March 2014].