Page:Open access and the humanities - contexts, controversies and the future.pdf/191

 Adema and Rutten, ‘Digital Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences’, p. 13.

Collins, ‘OAPEN-UK Literature Review V1’, p. 2.

Adeline Koh and Ken Wissoker, ‘On Monographs, Libraries and Blogging: A Conversation with Duke University Press, Part One’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 2013 http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/what-is-the-future-of-the-monograph-a-conversation-with-duke-university-press-part-one/48263 [accessed 16 March 2014].

Hazel Newton, ‘Breaking Boundaries in Academic Publishing: Launching a New Format for Scholarly Research’, Insights: The UKSG Journal, 26 (2013), 70–6 (p. 71) http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048–7754.26.1.70.

At a risk of a technical digression too far, XML is a markup language in which information is encoded alongside its metadata. For instance Smith might be the way in which the word ‘Smith’ is signalled as an author’s last name inside such a document. The most common format for encoding of scholarly documents is the Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS), which, despite its name, can also handle books (although there is also a parallel format). Such a format serves as an intermediary stage in a three-step plan: (1) authors submit in a format of their choice; (2) this is then converted to the intermediate XML; (3) which is then, itself, converted into all the various desired output formats (PDF, EPUB, MOBI, HTML etc.). Stage 2 is difﬁcult (and expensive as this software can often cost tens of thousands of US dollars per year to license), but it then enables a far easier and uniﬁed process at stage 3 whereby all the outputs are created from a single, easily readable source. Martin Paul Eve, ‘The Means of (Re-)Production: Expertise, Open Tools, Standards and Communication’, Publications, 2 (2014), 38–43 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications2010038.

I.T. Strategies, ‘The Evolution of the Book Industry: Implications for U.S. Book Manufacturers and Printers’, 2013, p. 21 http://rpp.ricoh-usa.com/images/uploads/Literature/whitepapers/IT-Strategies_FINAL.pdf [accessed 11 July 2014].

G. Dean Kortge and Patrick A. Okonkwo, ‘Perceived Value Approach to Pricing’, Industrial Marketing Management, 22 (1993), 133–40 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0019–8501(93)90039-A.

Kristina Shampanier, Nina Mazar and Dan Ariely, ‘Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products’, Marketing Science, 26 (2007), 742–57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0254; Mauricio M. Palmeira and Joydeep Srivastava, ‘Free Offer ≠ Cheap Product: A Selective Accessibility Account on the Valuation of Free Offers’, Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2013), 644–56 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/671565.

Thompson, Books in the Digital Age, p. 46.