Page:Open access and the humanities - contexts, controversies and the future.pdf/179

 See also John Bohannon’s ‘sting’ and the retorts from its critics: John Bohannon, ‘Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?’, Science, 342 (2013), 60–5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60; Martin Paul Eve, ‘Flawed Sting Operation Singles out Open Access Journals’, The Conversation, 2013 http://theconversation.com/ﬂawed-sting-operation-singles-out-open-access-journals-18846 [accessed 23 January 2014]; Amy Buckland and others, ‘On the Mark? Responses to a Sting’, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2 (2013) http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162–3309.1116.

Jeffrey Beall, ‘The Open-Access Movement Is Not Really about Open Access’, ''tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 11 (2013), 589–97 (p. 589); Joseph Esposito, ‘Parting Company with Jeffrey Beall’, The Scholarly Kitchen'', 2013 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/12/16/parting-company-with-jeffrey-beall/ [accessed 23 January 2014].

Wayne Bivens-Tatum, ‘Reactionary Rhetoric against Open Access Publishing’, ''tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society'', 12 (2014), 441–6 (pp. 442–3).

Richard Smith, ‘The Irrationality of the REF’, BMJ, 2013 http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2013/05/07/richard-smith-the-irrationality-of-the-ref/ [accessed 11 February 2014]; Lindsay Waters, ‘Rescue Tenure from the Tyranny of the Monograph’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 20 April 2001 https://chronicle.com/article/Rescue-Tenure-From-the-Tyranny/9623 [accessed 18 May 2014].

Michael Jensen, ‘Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?’, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39 (2007), 297–307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/scp.2007.0027.

Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, 1977), p. 180.

Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, p. 195.

Longina Jakubowska, Patrons of History: Nobility, Capital and Political Transitions in Poland, Google Books (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2012), no page.

Peter Suber, ‘Thinking about Prestige, Quality, and Open Access’, 2008 http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4322577 [accessed 21 April 2014].

Peter Suber, ‘Open Access and Quality’, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 2006 http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4552042 [accessed 1 May 2014].

The most recent of which is Higher Education Funding Council for England, ‘Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment’, 2014 www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/howfundr/metrics/ [accessed 21 June 2014].