Page:Novoa v. Diaz.pdf/78

 *Professor Almond has standing to challenge the IFA’s third and fourth concepts against the members of the Board of Governors in their official capacities; Conversely, Professor Plaintiffs have not demonstrated standing for a preliminary injunction challenging the IFA’s prohibitions concerning those concepts that will not affect their classroom instruction.
 * Professor Novoa has standing to challenge the IFA’s first, second, third, fifth, and seventh concepts against the members of the Board of Governors in their official capacities and the members of the University of South Florida’s Board of Trustees in their official capacities.

Now to the Student Plaintiffs, who bring a right-to-receive-information claim under the First Amendment. See ECF No. 1 at 84–85, in Case No.: 4:22cv304-MW/MAF; ECF No. 1 at 76, in Case No.: 4:22cv324-MW/MAF. As this Court explains supra, in the context of these cases, a student’s right-to-receive-information claim is coextensive with a professor’s free speech claim. Similarly, the Student Plaintiffs have standing to bring this claim only to the extent they can demonstrate