Page:Novoa v. Diaz.pdf/77

 Accordingly, this Court finds that the Professor Plaintiffs (save Dr. Dunn in Pernell) have standing to bring their First Amendment challenge against Defendants (save the Boards of Trustees in Pernell and the Inspector General in Novoa) as follows:
 * Professor Pernell has standing to challenge the IFA’s third and fourth concepts against the members of the Board of Governors in their official capacities;
 * Professor Dorsey has standing to challenge the IFA’s third, fourth, and eighth concepts against the members of the Board of Governors in their official capacities;
 * Professor Austin has standing to challenge the IFA’s third, fourth, sixth, and eighth concepts against the members of the Board of Governors in their official capacities;
 * Professor Park has standing to challenge the IFA’s first, second, third, fourth, fifth, seventh, and eighth concepts against the members of the Board of Governors in their official capacities;
 * Professor Sandoval has standing to challenge the IFA’s third and eighth concepts against the members of the Board of Governors in their official capacities;