Page:Novoa v. Diaz.pdf/66

 scientists to the status of derivative thinkers.” Id. ¶ 161. Professor Novoa also assigns an article arguing that the “new human sciences” used “racial differences between human groups” as the “chief means” of mapping the human world. Id. ¶ 170. Assigning her own work treating the existence of racial privilege as a given arguably implicates the IFA’s third concept, as does her intention to promote another author’s arguments in favor of race consciousness as part of her class discussions. See § 1000.05(4)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2022); Regulation 10.005(1)(a)3.

In the fall 2022 semester, Professor Novoa is teaching History of Sports from National to Global Contexts. In this course, she asserts that she traditionally assigns articles that promote the following viewpoints: Professor Novoa promotes these arguments through her lectures, see id. ¶¶ 179, 186, which arguably implicates IFA’s concept three. See § 1000.05(4)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2022); Regulation 10.005(1)(a)3.
 * “Afro-Latino baseball players, despite coming from different backgrounds and cultures, were reduced to their perceived racial identity.” ECF No. 1 ¶ 180, in Case No.: 4:22cv324-MW/MAF.
 * “[D]espite making progress on racial issues, the United States remains segregated by race.” Id. ¶ 184.
 * “[W]hite Americans have historically been privileged to the detriment of nonw-hite” or “subordinate groups … .” Id. ¶ 193.