Page:Notes and Queries - Series 12 - Volume 7.djvu/260

 212

NOTES AND QUERIES. [12 s. vn. SEPT. 11, 1920.

INFLUENCE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE ON STYLE.

(12 S. vii. 89, 152.)

IN this present age of slipshod English the statement that the best writer of our language is he who is familiar with none but his own should not pass without protest. It is opposed to all the ideas of English and education that have prevailed in the past, and is not, so far as I am aware, supported by adequate examples. It cuts out nearly all our famous authors a glorious company too familiar to lovers of English to be named in detail. It cuts out the men who made our English Bible. For centuries our best writers have been familiar with Latin and French, and in many cases with Greek. These languages lie at the back of English, and are just as important as the Anglo- Saxon element in it. Without their assis- tance in form and meaning, it is difficult to avoid mistakes in English. A character in ' Mansfield Park ' says, *' Shakespeare one gets acquainted with without knowing how It is a part of an Englishman's constitution. ' The result of this gay presumption of knowledge can be seen in many silly books In a similar way, the average Englishman thinks that he can talk and write English without knowing it. The simple fact is tha he is deceiving himself. He relies on instinc to carry him through, and it does so wonder fully on the whole ; but he makes mistake which remove him from the class of the best. He needs knowledge of a regularly inflected language to enable him to ge right the few remaining inflections in English He must know foreign languages, to ge right the many strange words which ou acquisitive tongue adds so freely to th common vocabulary. A word taken direc from the Latin may be plural in English but derived through French, may be turnec into a singular. How is the writer wit nothing but English to know whethe "propaganda " and "data" take a singula or a plural verb ? I have seen both wron within the present week. I have notec among writers of established repute i prose and verse errors of which an educatec man would be ashamed. They venturec further than they knew. Matthew Amok when studying education in France, wrot

lat Latin and Greek were "cultivated [most entirely with a view to giving a pupil a mastery over his own language," the result >eing that such mastery was common in France, and "scarcely ever" attained in. country. Arnold * also says in his Betters : " Too much time is wasted over rammar but it is true, as Goethe said, ,hat no man who knows only his own, anguage, knows even that."

The verdict of an admirable writer and ritic, who was also directly concerned in ducation, is surely worth considering. I annot suppose that Lord Esher would >rush Arnold away as negligible. It may >e true that a first rate writer of English s born ; but he is also made, and largely made by the study of other languages. The instinct for ornament leads inevitably the use of sonorous words which are not of Anglo-Saxon origin. It leads also in- vitably in the ignorant to the misuse of uch words. Human error after a while >ecomes a depressing subject, otherwise I could easily produce a long list of howlers- 'or the last thirty years, a handbook to English sans le savoir, as she is wrote by all sorts and conditions of Englishmen.

V. R.

THE STATURE or PEPYS (12 S. vi. 110, 216 ; vii. 155). Your correspondent will find in one of the issues of Braybrooke's edition Bohn, 1894) of the 'Diary,' the following 'ootnote to the ' Life,' p. xxxviii.

Murray, rector of St. Dunstan's in the East, that in the summer of 1836, when the church of St. Olave, Hart Street, was under repair, a vault was found on the north side of the Communion table, containing a skull and some bones, which being uppermost, were probably the remains of Samuel Pepys, he having been the last of his family there interred. It is singular, that in the same spot a stone of the size of a walnut was- discovered among the remains."
 * ' I am informed by the Rev. Thomas Boyles-

Lof tie in ' In and Out of London ' repeats the first part of the statement. Whether it has any foundation in fact, who shall say ? I cannot find that the Rev. A. Povah, makes any reference to this or to the C r ypt which is strange seeing how ex- haustively he dealt with the church in his 'Annals of St. Olave's.'

The late Bryan Corcoran, in his excellent Guide to the Church, says :

" Unfortunately the ancient crypt beneath the- church, probably divided into several vaults, with its beautiful black and white marble squares, instead of being cleared out and preserved, was filled up in 1853."