Page:Note-by-Chair-and-selected-documents-ordered-from-Six4Three.pdf/6

 Email from Konstantinos Papamiltidas to Tinder 11 March 2015 5.34pm

‘I was not sure there was not a question about compensation, apologies; in my mind we have been working collaboratively with xx and the team in good faith for the past 16 or so months. He’s a member of a trusted group of advisers for our platform (Developer Advisory Board) and based on our commitment to provide a great and safe experience for the Tinder users, we have developed two new APIs that effectively allow Tinder to maintain parity of the product in the new API world.’

Email from Konstantinos Papamiltidas to Tinder 12 March 2015 1.10pm

‘We have been working with xx and his team in true partnership spirit all this time, delivering value that we think is far greater than this trademark.’

Mark Zuckerberg email–dated 7 October 2012

‘I’ve been thinking about platform business model a lot this weekend…if we make it so devs can generate revenue for us in different ways, then it makes it more acceptable for us to charge them quite a bit more for using platform. The basic idea is that any other revenue you generate for us earns you a credit towards whatever fees you own us for using plaformplatform [sic]. For most developers this would probably cover cost completely. So instead of every paying us directly, they’d just use our payments or ads products. A basic model could be:

Login with Facebook is always free

Pushing content to Facebook is always free

Reading anything, including friends, costs a lot of money. Perhaps on the order of $0.10/user each year.

For the money that you owe, you can cover it in any of the following ways:

Buys ads from us in neko or another system

Run our ads in your app or website (canvas apps already do this)

Use our payments

Sell your items in our Karma store.

Or if the revenue we get from those doesn’t add up to more that the fees you owe us, then you just pay us the fee directly.’

MZ email 27 October 2012 to Sam Lessin at Facebook