Page:North Dakota Reports (vol. 3).pdf/45

 executor and administrators, that the premises are free from all incumbrances.

An express covenant in a*deed takes away all implied covenants. Vanderkarr v. Vanderkarr, 11 Johns. 122; Douglass v. Lewis, 131 U. S. 75; 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 634; Bowne v. Wolcott, 1 N. D. 497; 48 N. W. Rep. 426. The vendor selling in good faith is not responsible for the goodness of his title beyond the extent of his covenants in the deed. Patton v. Taylor, 48 U. S., (L. Ed.) 649; Noonan v. Lee, 17 (L. Ed.) 278. In an action on the covenant against incumbrances, the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to show that any incumbrance was lawful. Lathrop v. Grosvenor, 76 Mass. 52; Ogden v. Ball, 41 N. W. Rep. 453; Hamilton v. Cutts, 4 Mass. 352. A coyenant against incumbrances is not broken by the existence of a recorded tax deed which passes no valid title. Tibbetts v. Leeson, 18 N. E. Rep. 679.

Bartholomew, J. In February, 1883, the defendants, who are husband and wife, executed to plaintiff a deed to certain real estate in the city of Bismarck. Subsequently, plaintiff purchased a claim under a tax deed upon said premises. The tax deed was based upon a city tax for a sidewalk abutting the premises, which sidewalk was constructed prior to the execution of the deed from defendants to plaintiff, and while the defendant, Joseph Dietrich, was the fee owner of the premises. This claim is brought upon the covenants against incumbrances in the deed from defendants to plaintiff, to recover the amount paid for the claim under the tax deed. The case was tried to the court, and defendants prevailed. Plaintiff brings the case into this court. Numerous errors are as- signed, but they all arise under one of two points: First. Does the deed sued upon contain any covenants that will sustain this action? Second. Was the claim for the sidewalk tax a valid lien against the property at the time of the conveyance? The second point becomes material only in case the first is resolved in favor of the plaintiff. The conveyance from defendants to plaintiff contains in the granting clause the words, “do hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey,” etc. It also contains the following special