Page:North Dakota Reports (vol. 2).pdf/157

 Taylor Crum for respondent:

The court will presume nothing in favor of the party alleging error. Carman v. Pultz, 21 N. Y. 547; People v. Whiting, 53 Cal. 420; Viele v. Railroad Co., 20 N. Y. 184. The party appealing must show from the facts that the law is necessarily in his favor. G rant v. Morse, 22 N. Y. 324; Ford v. Pearson, 15 Pac. Rep. 535. The party alleging error must show it specifically. Briant v. Trimmer, 47 N. Y. 96; Acker v. Carver, 23 Minn, 567. The presumption of law is that there was evidence to sustain every fact found. Dale v. Anderson, 27 Cal. 250; Lyon v. Lenbeck, 29 Cal. 139. Under the facts of this case, as shown in the statement, there were presented questions of fact for the determination of the jury. Railroad Co. v. Jones, 95 U. S. 441; Bank v. Guttchlick, 14 Pet. 19; Railrcad Co. v. Pollard, 22 Wall. 341; Richardson v. Boston, 19 How. 263; Railroad Co. v. Stout, 17 Wall. 657; Dewire v. Railroad Co., 19 N. E. Rep. 523; Torry v. Railroad Co., 18 N. E. Rep. 213; Scanlon v. Railroad Co., 18 N. E. Rep. 209; Pidcock v. Railroad Co., 19 Pac. Rep. 191; Railroad Co. v. Boudron, 37 Am. Rep. 707; Spooner v. Railroad Co., 54 N. Y. 234; Nolan v. Railroad Co., 87 N. Y. 67; Willis v. Railroad Co., 34 N. Y. 675; Clark v. Railroad Co., 36 N. Y. 135; Colgrove v. Railroad Co., 20 N. Y. 492; Sullivan v. Railroad Co., Am. St. Rep. 239; Dobieki v. Sharp, 88 N. Y. 204; Werle v. Railroad Co., 98 N. Y. 650; Ginna v. Railroad Co., 67 N. Y. 596; Railroad Co. v. Gregory, 58 Ill. 272; Railroad Co. v. Welch, 52 Ill. 183; Railroad Co. v. Russell, 33 Am. Rep. 54; Spencer v. Railroad Co., 17 Wis. 503; Barton v. Railroad Co., 14 Am. Rep. 418; Railroad Co. v. Pondrom, 2 Am. Rep. 306; Farlow v. Kelley, 108 U. S. 288; Breen v. Railroad Co., 16 N. E. Rep. 60; Dohlberg v. Railroad Co., 21 N. W. Rep. 545; Dickinson v. Railroad Co., 18 N. W. Rep. 553; Robel v. Railroad Co., 27 N. W. Rep. 305; Railroad Co. v. Rowan, 3 N. E. Rep. 629; Railroad Co. v. Irwin, 16 Pac. Rep. 150; Railroad Co. v. Johnson, 4 N. E. Rep. 383; Holden v. Railroad Co., 2 Amer. & Eng. R. Cas. 102; Nugent v. Railroad Co., 38 Id 52. A general verdict having received the sanction of the trial court must be treated as a finding of every thing necessary to sustain the general finding.