Page:Nestorius and his place in the history of Christian doctrine.djvu/109

Rh Cyrillian tradition, but Leo asserted in his letter, that the unity of Christ's person was seen "in two natures ," and especially blamed Eutyches for not having been willing to concede the duality of the natures after the incarnation, while allowing the term. The Roman legates, therefore, energetically opposed the phrase in the draft of the creed and they succeeded in substituting  for. One self-consistent view, therefore, could not be attained in Chalcedon; a compromise had to be made. And it was made by recognising as standards of faith at the same time Leo's letter and Cyril's epistola dogmatica and epistola ad Orientales. Cyril's epistola synodica, which understood the in the sense of a, was not