Page:NPPC v. Ross.pdf/6

6 do not provide judges “a roving license” to reassess the wisdom of state legislation in light of any conceivable out-of-state interest, economic or otherwise. United Haulers, 550 U. S., at 343. Pp 25–27.

, announced the judgment of the Court, and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, IV–A, and V, in which, , , and , joined, an opinion with respect to Parts IV–B and IV–D, in which and , joined, and an opinion with respect to Part IV–C, in which , , and , joined. , filed concurring in part, in which, joined. , filed concurring in part. , filed concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which, , and , joined. , filed concurring in part and dissenting in part.