Page:NPPC v. Ross.pdf/5

Rh Tracy, 519 U. S., at 298, n. 12, petitioners’ claim about Proposition 12 falls well outside Pike’s heartland. Pp 15–18.

, joined by and, concluded in Part IV–D that petitioners have not asked the Court to treat putative harms to out-of-state animal welfare or other noneconomic interests as freestanding harms cognizable under the dormant Commerce Clause, and in any event that the Court’s decisions authorizing claims alleging “burdens on commerce,” Davis, 553 U. S., at 353,