Page:NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods - Chapter E.pdf/4

 represented by an independent method. An experimental approach for collecting the data necessary for this determination is described below.

As part of the evaluation of a method, the sampling of a generated atmosphere is needed to more adequately assess the performance of a method [8,9,10]. This allows the determination of 1) the capacity of the sampler; 2) the efficiency of analyte collection by the sampler; 3) the repeatability of the method; 4) the bias in the method; 5) interferences in the collection of the sample. Concentration ranges to be used in the evaluation of the method should be based on several factors. These ranges, at a minimum, should cover 0.1 to 2.0 times the exposure limit. In some instances, higher multiples of the exposure limit can be added if needed (e.g., 10 times the exposure limit). In situations where multiple exposure limits (i.e., from different authorities) exist for an analyte, the lowest exposure limit should be used to set the lower limit of the evaluation range (0.1 times lowest exposure limit) and the highest limit used to calculate the upper limit of evaluation range (2 times the highest exposure limit). Intermediate evaluation concentrations should be within these exposure limits. The toxicity of an analyte (e.g., suspected carcinogenicity) may indicate that a concentration lower than that calculated by the exposure limit should be included in the measurement and evaluation ranges. Previous monitoring information from other methods may indicate that typical concentrations of the analyte may be below or above a concentration range based on the exposure limit. In this case, this lower or upper level may be included in the method evaluation.

a.

In order to provide a realistic test of the method under study, air concentrations covering the range from 0.1 to 2 times the exposure limit of the analyte should be generated. The generated atmospheres should be homogeneous in concentration and representative of the environment encountered when sampling for the analyte in the workplace.

When attempting to generate a concentration of an analyte, the impact of environmental conditions, such as temperature, pressure, humidity, and interferences, on sampler performance and/or generation should be considered. The effect of elevated temperature on the collection medium of a sampler may decrease the capacity of the sampler or may decompose the analyte during generation and sampling. Reduced pressure may also reduce the capacity of a sampler. High relative humidity in many instances has been observed to reduce sampler capacity [3]. In other instances it has increased sampler capacity [11]. A typical interference(s) should be generated along with the analyte to approximate a typical workplace sampling environment.

Generation of particulate material can be extremely complex [12,13], especially if particles of a required size range must be generated for the evaluation of a specified sampler inlet design. The aerodynamic performance of the generator is a factor in the generation of this type of atmosphere and should be evaluated carefully. Appropriate, independent methods should be available to verify particle size, if this is a critical element in the generation.

The concentration of the generated atmosphere should be verified either by well characterized gravimetric/volumetric means or by analysis of replicate samples (if possible) by an independent method at each concentration used. Further details on this verification are included in the literature [1]. A statistician should be consulted for advice on the design and sample sizes to accomplish this validation. Ideally, the independent method should not be biased and should provide an accurate estimate of the concentration generated, assuming error is randomly distributed around the mean. Also the precision and bias of the independent method should be homogeneous over the concentrations investigated. (See Reference 1 for the 1/15/98