Page:NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods - Chapter D.pdf/5



Temperature
 * Since all adsorption is exothermic, adsorption is reduced at higher temperatures. Additionally, if there is a reaction between an adsorbed species and the surface, or between two or more adsorbed species (e.g., hydrolysis or polymerization), the rate of such reactions increases at higher temperatures.


 * Temperature stability of a filter must be considered when sampling hot environments such as stack effluents.

Humidity*
 * Water vapor is adsorbed by polar sorbents; their breakthrough capacity for the analyte is thereby reduced for most organic compounds. However, for water soluble compounds, the breakthrough capacity is increased, e.g., chlorine and bromine [8] and formaldehyde [3]. This effect varies from substantial for more polar sorbents, such as charcoal and silica gel, to a smaller effect for Ambersorbs™ and porous polymers.


 * Filter media may also be affected by humidity. Moisture may affect a filter’s collection efficiency. Very low humidities (#10% RH) may make some filters (e.g., cellulose ester) develop high charge levels, causing non-uniform deposits and repulsion of particles [9]. Water absorption by some filters (e.g., cellulose ester) can cause difficulty in obtaining tare weights for gravimetric analysis.

Sampling flow rate*/ Face velocity
 * Breakthrough volume of a solid sorbent bed tends to be smaller at higher sampling flow rates, particularly for coated solid sorbents. For sorbents such as charcoal whose breakthrough capacity for most organic compounds can be significantly reduced by high humidity, lower sampling flow rates may actually result in smaller breakthrough volumes [10]. The collection efficiency of filters will change with face velocity.

Concentration*
 * As the concentration of contaminant in air increases, breakthrough capacity (mg adsorbed) of a solid sorbent bed increases, but breakthrough volume (L of air sampled) decreases [10].

Particle Characteristics
 * Filter collection efficiency is a function of pore size [11]. Particles smaller than about 0.2 µm are collected primarily by diffusion, while particles larger than about 0.2 µm are collected primarily by impaction and interception. Most sampling filters are highly efficient ($95%) for all particle sizes, with the minimum efficiency in the 0.2 µm size range. Polycarbonate straight pore filters exhibit poor collection by diffusion, so particles smaller than the pore size are not collected efficiently.

Filter considerations
 * The pressure drop of a filter can limit the sampling time, because of the load on the personal sampling pump. In addition, pressure drop increases with dust loading on the

1/15/98