Page:NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods - 1024.pdf/5

 1,3-BUTADIENE: METHOD 1024, Issue 2, dated 15 August 1994 - Page 5 of 8

In a study of temperature effects on storage stability, 400-mg charcoal tubes were spiked with 26 µg 1,3-butadiene and stored either at ambient temperature or in a freezer below –4 °C. Recoveries were measured relative to media standards stored overnight in the freezer. The recoveries (and days stored) were 94% (7), 93% (14), and 98% (21) for the frozen samples, and 95% (1), 76% (7), 61% (14), and 65% (21) for the ambient samples. In a preliminary evaluation of precision and accuracy, charcoal tubes were spiked with 125 µg 1,3butadiene via calibrated sampling valve. The recovery was 102.2% versus media standards (corrected for desorption efficiency) and 96.8% versus standard solutions (uncorrected for desorption efficiency); the of the response was 0.016. Subsequently, simulated samples were exposed to known amounts of approximately 10% 1,3-butadiene in helium, followed by 25 L of air at 80% RH. The 1,3-butadiene concentration was independently determined by packed column gas chromatography with thermal conductivity detection. Media standards were prepared via calibrated sampling valves. The recovery from six simulated samples at 463 µg per sample was 101.6% versus media standards and 91.3% versus standard solutions; the of the response was 0.047. At 45.3 µg per sample, the recovery was 112.3% versus media standards and 102.9% versus standard solutions; the of the response was 0.048. At 4.64 µg per sample, the recovery was 80.3% versus media standards and 103.8% versus standard solutions; the of the response was 0.011. In the latter experiment, the two lowest levels of media standards appeared to be high, possibly due to absorption and release of 1,3-butadiene by internal parts of the sampling valve. The study was repeated at 4.71 µg, with the three lowest levels of media standards prepared as in step 10. The recovery was 129.5% versus media standards and 91.2% versus standard solutions; the of the response was 0.023. The of the response pooled for all levels was 0.033. Assuming a sampling pump error of 0.05, the precision of the total sampling and analytical method was 0.060. For levels at and above 45 µg (0.8 ppm in 25 L), apparent biases may be attributed to experimental errors in the preparation and analysis of standards and samples rather than a true bias in the method. At lower levels, based on the linear response and near-zero intercept observed for the standard solution calibrations and the higher than expected desorption efficiencies for the samples, there appeared to be a positive bias in the preparation of the simulated samples. The method has been used in six industrial hygiene surveys, for a total of 621 samples, most of which were collected under conditions of high ambient temperature and humidity. Only two samples showed significant breakthrough ( >  /10). Results for field samples at levels as high as 7.3 mg per sample were not significantly changed by dilution and reanalysis. In all, over 2000 analyses were made over a period of six months without any deterioration of the chromatographic columns. During the course of the analyses, twenty sets of standard solutions and media standards were prepared and analyzed, each set consisting of triplicates at each of five levels corresponding to 1.08 to 1.10, 4.32 to 4.40, 17.3 to 17.6, 108 to 110, and 432 to 441 µg per sample. For the five levels of standard solutions, the respective pooled relative standard deviations of the observed responses were 0.093, 0.074, 0.059, 0.055, and 0.071. For each set of standard solutions, the deviations of the responses were determined relative to the line resulting from a weighted linear regression of response on concentration. The 95% confidence intervals for the mean relative deviations from linearity for the five levels were –0.002 ± 0.003, 0.000 ± 0.003, –0.020 ± 0.002, 0.002 ± 0.002, and –0.019 ± 0.002, respectively. For the media standards, the respective pooled for the observed responses at the five levels were 0.109, 0.080, 0.050, 0.064, and 0.037; the respective 95% confidence intervals for the mean percent recoveries relative to the standard solution calibrations were 60.4 ± 0.4, 66.4 ± 0.3, 70.5 ± 0.2, 86.2 ± 0.3, and 91.2 ± 0.2. The analysis of quality assurance blind spikes provided additional data indicating that samples were stable when stored below –4 °C, and that average recoveries, calibrated against media standards, ranged from 96 to 107%. Seventy-seven blind spikes were prepared at six levels, 19.9 to 21.9, 48.6 to 52.6, 104 to 110, 199 to 219, 398 to 438, and 663 µg per sample, stored in a freezer, and analyzed along with the field samples. The storage times ranged from 3 to 134 days; the average was 59 days. For the six levels of blind spikes, the respective relative standard deviations for recoveries were 0.210, 0.092, NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition