Page:Modern review 1921 v29.pdf/833

434, h. , Dr Gauranganath Banerji, h. , Professor , h. , Professor Panchanan Mitra, etc. There are lesser luminaries such as the holders of the Calcutta University Jubilee Prize Medal and other prizes for original research. The educated public of India have received another shock from the statement in the notes of the April issue of the Modern Review, as it is generally believed that the Editor of the Modern Review is responsible for these notes. It is stated there,

"“In Sir report to the Senate Dr. Ramdas Khan’s monograph on Society in Evolution published by the Calcutta University is numbered among the monographs which he praises as constituting ‘valuable’ contributions to the advancement of our knowledge. Why is this monograph still withheld from a public thirsting for the advancement of its knowledge a la Goldighi? Who are the judges that certified Dr. Khan’s book as original addition to human knowledge? Who ordered it to be printed at the cost of our University?”"

Further on it is stated —

"“The Bengal public have a right to know the name of these fleeting spectres of humanity who direct, judge and reward the research work of that University and stamp such monographs with the seal of their approval.”"

If Prof. Jadunath Sarkar thinks it to be beneath his dignity to be associated or ranked in the same degree with the new generation of Research Scholars produced by the University of Calcutta or with those who have in recent years obtained Premchand Roychand Scholarship or h. . degrees, then there must be some serious reasons for it. As one of his students and as one of the very few people who received training in methods of critical research work personally from him as well as from his publications, I refuse to believe that a man like Jadunath Sarkar can make such a sweeping statement unless he is impelled to do so by reasons which have not been made public. It is therefore high time that all members and graduates of the University of Calcutta took up this subject and investigated it thoroughly. The University of Calcutta is entering on a new phase of existence. It has been announced in the papers that in future our alma mater will have no connection with the Government of India and that His Excellency Lord has reappointed Sir Asutosh Mukherji as a Vice-Chancellor of that body it is to be hoped therefore that the days of internal struggle will now be over and the second period of Sir Asutosh’s Vice-Chancellorship will be a period of unbroken triumph for himself and the University. If mistakes have been committed in the past, let us hope that the old Vice-Chancellor in his new regime will correct them and the band of faithful men, University Professors, Lecturers, and Research Scholars, who have gathered round him, will profit by their experiences in the past in order to avoid such errors in the future. But in order to do so we must find out what these errors are and if we are at fault we must acknowledge our faults with an open heart so that the success of a national institution may be assured. It is therefore necessary to start our enquiries with the statement made by the Editor of the Modern Review in the April issue of that journal “Who are the judges, who certified products of research work, submitted for examinations by scholars to the University of Calcutta. If they are thorough masters of the subject which they have to examine, then why should a man like Professor Jadunath Sarkar, whose contributions to human knowledge have been certified to be genuine efforts towards the advancement of learning by men who are noted for their intimate knowledge of the particular subject, refuse to rank himself with scholars? Will any member of the Calcutta University therefore kindly produce a list of examiners who have examined the theses submitted for examination by scholars who have obtained the Premchand Roychand Scholarship or the h. . degree of the Calcutta University during the last 15 years?