Page:Marvin, Legal Bibliography, 1847.djvu/503

 MAD MADAN, M. Thelypthora ; or, a Treatise on Female Ruin, con- sidered on the Basis of the Divine Law, under the following Heads : Marriage, Polygamy, Divorce, &c. 2d ed. 3 vols. 8vo. London. 1781, . Thoughts on Executive Justice, with respect to the Criminal Laws, particularly on the Circuits ; dedicated to the Judges of Assize, &;c. ; with an Appendix, occasioned by a Charge given to the Grand Jury of the County of Surrey. 2d ed. Svo. London. 1785. MADDOCK, HENRY. A Treatise on the Principles and Practice of the Court of Chancery. 3d ed., with considerable Additions. 2 vols. Svo. London. 1837. 3d American ed., with the Addi- tion of the principal American Decisions in Chancery, upon the Plan of the Original Work. By Thomas Huntington. 2 vols. Svo. Hartford. 1827. 4th ed. 2 vols. Svo. Philadelphia. 1832. Maddock's Chancery is a comprehensive Treatise, and is in general use as a text book in England, and was, formerly, in this country, before the appearance of Judge Story's writings upon Equity. It was written while the author was quite young, and has been considerably enlarged in the successive editions. The work embraces a pretty thorough col- lection of Cases, but its arrangement is, in some respects, arbitrary, and the author's deductions are not always to be depended upon. 15 A. J. 367; 12 L. O. 522; 2 Jurist, 330. . Reports of Cases argued and determined in the Court of the Vice-Chancellor of England, during the Time of Sir Thomas Plumer and Sir John Leach. 5 vols. Svo. London. 1817-22. — — . An Account of the Life and Writings of Lord Chancellor Somers. 4to. London. 1812. MADDOCK, HENRY, and T. C. GELDART. Reports of Cases argued and determined in the Court of the Vice-Chancellor of England, during the Time of Sir John Leach. Svo. London. 1829. " Sir John Leach seemed to think that what he had to do was chiefly to avoid the dilatory habits of Lord Eldon. Accordingly, he decided Cases with a rapidity so dangerous, that Sir Samuel Romilly said, his hasty injustice was far worse than the slow justice of the Chancellor; and appeals from his judgments being greatly multiplied, both Lord Eldon and Lord Brougham complained, saying, that causes were decided at the Rolls and heard before them." 1 Law. Rev. 273. 491