Page:Letters to Squire Pedant in the East.pdf/44

SQUIRE PEDANT. 37 ence, had been rather sinuous and protean. His juvenility had been maculated with many vicious extravagations. At the termination of his adolescence, he became a fustilarian, a scambler, a literator, and an omnivagant under the profession of a bletonist. By an esoteric and supernal influence he was speedily transformed into a pietist, and he transferred the acumen of his visual powers from subterrene objects, into the cryptic parts of the hagiography.

Surcharged with bibliomania, he was propense to bibliomancy. He was a thorough solifidian, catabaptist, saturnist, and I may adject, a mere theologaster.

His hierology was on the appropinquation of the empyrosis of this macrocosm, based on the fatidical part of the hierography. His farrand of allocution was sui generis. The illiterature and inurbanity of the precedaneous part of his life, were very tralucent, and his intonations, dolent. In the mobility of his corporeity, he resembled a funambulist; in his elocution, his vocal powers ascended from an almost inaudible susurration to crocitation - from crocitation to such a vociferation that made him dreul, and was puissant enough to laniate his guttural orifice, - his decadences terminated in mere susurration. His defectuous mimesis of Whitefield was very perceptible. In his eclaircissement of the vaticinal portion of the hagiography in relation to the finale of this mundane structure, he made certain occurrences isochronous which other glossologists and authentic historiographers greatly eloined from each other. In his epilogisms in relation to fatidical events, he evinced an aspernation of all embolisms; he gave an anagogical interpretation to prophetic icons, which all noetic elucidators have perpended as literal.

In verity, his hierology was so replete with anfractuosities, pseudologies, fallencies, anachronisms, para-