Page:Lesser Eastern Churches.djvu/283

Rh with it, must first make up their minds about the Council of Chalcedon. Reunion with the Copts is only possible if Anglicans turn Monophysite, or succeed in converting Copts to Chalcedon. This last case may be ruled out at once. To convert Copts to Chalcedon is just what Rome does; and they all denounce a Copt who abandons Monophysism as a renegade from his national Church. If all Copts abandoned the special teaching which constitutes their sect, that would mean the destruction of the very body which Anglicans call the Coptic Church. They all protest loudly that they do not want that.

On the other hand, it is no doubt true that an unsophisticated Coptic priest, or even bishop, probably understands very little about the issue defended at Chalcedon. If you showed him a Catholic statement, and he did not know whence it came, it is quite likely that he would say it is correct. This only means that his knowledge of all theology is a negligible quantity.

The Copts do not, of course, say the Filioque in their creed. They do not seem to have considered the question; but they would undoubtedly now describe it as a fresh Latin error, only adding a slightly darker shade to people who are already black with Chalcedonianism. Needless to say, they altogether reject the Pope's primacy and infallibility. To them, as to all schismatical Easterns, the Pope is a terrible danger, a mighty ogre who wants to swallow up pious Copts and turn them into Latins. Nor does the sight of the Uniate Copts give them any confidence.