Page:Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Trial Judgment).pdf/107

{| class="wikitable"; style="margin: auto;" T295.33–4 (Mr Lehrmann); T619.17–20 (Ms Higgins); Wenke (at [13]); Gain (at [41], [47])
 * 10 || The Dock || Spirit-based drink || Mr Lehrmann || 11:10pm || Ex R42 / Ex 17A (at 23:10:21)
 * 11 || The Dock || Spirit-based drink || "Dark jacket guy" (Mr Lehrmann gestures Ms Higgins to finish drink) || 11:50pm || Ex R42 / Ex 17A (at 23:50:55)
 * colspan="4" | Mr Lehrmann, Ms Higgins, Ms Gain and Mr Wenke leave The Dock for 88mph || 11:51pm || Ex R42 / Ex 17A (at 23:51:35)
 * 12–14 || 88mph || Between one to three 30ml shots or nips (as I will explain below, my finding is that Ms Higgins had at least two, but possibly more, spirit-based drinks at 88mph) || Unknown || 12:00am–1:30am ||
 * colspan="4" | Mr Lehrmann, Ms Higgins, Ms Gain and Mr Wenke leave The Dock for 88mph || 11:51pm || Ex R42 / Ex 17A (at 23:51:35)
 * 12–14 || 88mph || Between one to three 30ml shots or nips (as I will explain below, my finding is that Ms Higgins had at least two, but possibly more, spirit-based drinks at 88mph) || Unknown || 12:00am–1:30am ||
 * 12–14 || 88mph || Between one to three 30ml shots or nips (as I will explain below, my finding is that Ms Higgins had at least two, but possibly more, spirit-based drinks at 88mph) || Unknown || 12:00am–1:30am ||
 * 12–14 || 88mph || Between one to three 30ml shots or nips (as I will explain below, my finding is that Ms Higgins had at least two, but possibly more, spirit-based drinks at 88mph) || Unknown || 12:00am–1:30am ||
 * }

396 A review of the CCTV footage does not always show empty glasses. It is difficult to be certain as to whether Ms Higgins drained the dregs, but I am satisfied it is more likely than Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Trial Judgment) [2024] FCA 369