Page:Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Frank Varela.pdf/3

Rh Lewis, 584 U. S. ___, ___. This conclusion is consistent with the Court’s precedents holding that the FAA provides the default rule for resolving certain ambiguities in arbitration agreements. See, e. g., Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U. S. 614, 626. Pp. 9–12.

, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which, , , and , joined. , filed a concurring opinion. , filed a dissenting opinion, in which and, joined. , and, filed dissenting opinions. , filed a dissenting opinion, in which and, joined, and in which , joined as to Part II.