Page:Julius Caesar (1919) Yale.djvu/132

120 noticeably good treatment of Julius Cæsar among the discussions of the separate plays.)

Thomas R. Lounsbury: Shakespeare and Voltaire. New York, 1902. (A rather prolix study of pseudo-classicism's opposition to Shakespeare, with a searching discussion of Voltaire's revamping of Julius Cæsar.)

C. F. Tucker Brooke: ''Shakespeare's Plutarch. Vol. I: containing The Main Sources of Julius Cæsar.'' London, 1909. (A very convenient and thorough edition of North for the student's purposes.)

M. W. MacCallum: Shakespeare's Roman Plays and their Background. London, 1910. (An elaborate and comprehensive work.)

W. F. P. Stockley: Reading Julius Cæsar. Dublin, n. d. (By no means first-class in quality, but offering many helpful suggestions to the elementary-school teacher.)

A. DeV. Tassin: Julius Cæsar, in Shaksperian Studies by Members of the Department of English in Columbia University. New York, 1916. (A fine piece of appreciative criticism, though one may fail to concur in all its views.)

H. H. Furness, Jr.: A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare. Vol. XVII: Julius Cæsar. Philadelphia, 1913. (For the faults of this volume, see the present writer's article in Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 1919.)