Page:International Code Council v. UpCodes (2020).pdf/48

 state regulation, lost its copyright protection and became part of the public domain.” BOCA, 628 F.2d at 735. Because federal law provides that documents in the public domain are not subject to copyright, state adoptions do not conflict with or present an obstacle to fulfillment of the Copyright Act’s goals. State enactments merely change a factual circumstance that in turn governs the extent to which ICC can enforce its copyrights as a matter of federal law. Accordingly, the Court concludes that the Supremacy Clause concerns raised by ICC do not significantly affect its public domain analysis.
 * 6. Statutory Considerations

ICC next argues that state references to copyrighted works cannot prevent it from enforcing its copyright as to the I-Codes as Adopted because a contrary holding would conflict with federal policy encouraging incorporation of copyrighted works by reference. Specifically, the National Technology and Transfer Advancement Act, codified in relevant part at 15 U.S.C. Sectionsection [sic] 272, and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-119 encourage federal agencies to incorporate copyrighted works by reference while nevertheless respecting private authors’ statutory copyrights. ( See Wise Decl. Exs. 2–3.)