Page:Interception of Communications and Surveillance Ordinance (Cap. 589).pdf/61

INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS AND SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE—SCHEDULE 3 and the provisions of subsection (3) apply, with necessary modifications, to the packet so sealed as they apply to the packet referred to in subsection (1).

(5) Nothing in this section prevents any of the documents and records referred to in subsection (1), or any copies of such documents and records, to be made available to the department concerned, whether for the purposes of any relevant written determination provision or pursuant to an order of a panel judge.

6) In this section, “relevant written determination provision” (有關書面決定條文) means section 9(3), 12(3), 24(5) (whether with or without reference to section 28 of this Ordinance), 27(5) or 34(3) of this Ordinance.

Rh

PART 1 An affidavit supporting an application for the issue of a judge’s authorization for interception is to—
 * (a) state which of the purposes specified in section 3(1)(a)(i) and (ii) of this Ordinance is sought to be furthered by carrying out the interception;
 * (b) set out—
 * (i) the form of the interception and the information sought to be obtained by carrying out the interception;
 * (ii) if known, the identity of any person who is to be the subject of the interception;
 * (iii) if known, particulars of the addresses, numbers, apparatus or other factors, or combination of factors, that are to be used for identifying any communication that is to be intercepted;
 * (iv) the proposed duration of the interception;
 * (v) the grounds for the reasonable suspicion specified in section 3(1)(b) of this Ordinance;