Page:Indian Philosophy Volume 1.djvu/11

 PREFACE

11'

interest is left untouched, and still more only very roughly sketched in. This work has no pretensions, to completeness in any sense of the term. It attempts to give such a general statement of the main results as shall serve to introduce the subject to those to whom it may not be known, and awaken if possibJe in some measure that interest for it to which it is so justly entitled. Even if it proves a failure, it may assist or at least encourage other attempts. My original plan was to publish the two volumes together. Kind friends like Professor J. S. Mackenzie suggested to me the desirability of bringing out the first volume immedi- ately. Since the preparation of. the second volume would take some time and the first is complete in itself, I venture to 'publish it independently. A 0 characteristic feature of many of the views discussed in this volume is that they ate motived, not so much by the logical impulse to account for the riddles of existence, as by the practical need for a support in life. It has been difficult to avoid discussions of, what' may appear to the reader, religious rather than philosophical issues, on account of the very close connexion between religion and philosophy in early Indian speculation. The second volume, however,. will be of a more purely philosophical character, since a predominantly theoretical interest gets the upper hand in the dar anas or 0 systems of philosophy, though the intimate connexion between know- ledge and life is not lost sight of. It is a pleasure to acknowledge my obligations to the many eminent orientalists whose works have been of great. help to me in my studies. It is not possible to mention all their names, which will be found in the course of the book. Mention must, however, be made of Max Miiller, Deussen, Keith, Jacobi, Garbe, Tilak, Bhandarkar, Rhys Davids and Mrs. Rhys Davids, 01denber , Poussin, Suzuki and Sagen.