Page:India—what can it teach us?.djvu/284

262 Palladius wrote (fourth century ), tame mustelae were still more common than cats, whether called cati or catti.

Evagrius scholasticus (Hist. Eccl. 17, 23), about 600, speaks of as the common name of , here meant, therefore, for cat. He says:.

And Isidorus, his contemporary, expresses himself in the same sense when saying (12, 2, 38), 'hunc (murionem) vulgus catum a captura vocant.'

If we admit, in the absence of evidence to the contrary effect, that the tame cat came from Egypt to Greece and Italy in the fourth century, and that the shrewd little animal was called by the Romans cătus, everything else becomes intelligible.

In the ruins of Pompeii, where the bones of horses, dogs, and goats have been found, no bones of cats have hitherto been discovered, and the pictures there which were supposed to be intended for cats, are now proved to be at all events not pictures of the tame cat.

In the language of Roumania no traces exist of the word catus, probably because at the time when that Romanic dialect became settled in Dacia, cătus did not yet exist as a Latin name for cat.

Mice were very troublesome, no doubt, to Greeks and Romans, but they fought against them, and against lizards and snakes also, not by cats, but by the or, the , and the  or. We must not suppose that the names of these animals were used by the ancients with anything like zoological accuracy. So much only is certain that, before the fourth century, none of them,