Page:Impeachment of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States — Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives.pdf/490

 The cable also sought to explain clearly "the importance of Ukraine and the security assistance to U.S. national security," according to Mr. Holmes.$869$ However, Mr. Holmes worried that the national security argument might not achieve its purpose given the reasons he suspected for the hold on military aid. His "clear impression" at the time was that "the security assistance hold was likely intended by the President either as an expression of dissatisfaction with the Ukrainians, who had not yet agreed to the Burisma/Biden investigation, or as an effort to increase the pressure on them to do so."$870$ Mr. Holmes viewed this as "the only logical conclusion."$871$ He had "no other explanation for why there was disinterest in this [White House] meeting that the President had already offered" and there was a "hold of the security assistance with no explanation whatsoever."$872$

Ambassador Taylor never received a response to his cable, but was told that Secretary Pompeo carried it with him to a White House meeting about security assistance to Ukraine.$873$

Ambassador Sondland Told Senator Johnson That Ukraine Aid Was Conditioned on Investigations

The next day, on August 30, Republican Senator Ron Johnson spoke with Ambassador Sondland to express his concern about President Trump's decision to withhold military assistance to Ukraine. According to Senator Johnson, Ambassador Sondland told him that if Ukraine would commit to "get to the bottom of what happened in 2016—if President Trump has that confidence, then he'll release the military spending."$874$

On August 31, Senator Johnson spoke by phone with President Trump regarding the decision to withhold aid to Ukraine.$875$ President Trump denied the quid pro quo that Senator Johnson had learned of from Ambassador Sondland.$876$ At the same time, however, President Trump refused to authorize Senator Johnson to tell Ukrainian officials that the aid would be forthcoming.$877$

The message that Ambassador Sondland communicated to Senator Johnson mirrored that used by President Trump during his July 25 call with President Zelensky, in which President Trump twice asked that the Ukrainian leader "get to the bottom of it," including in connection to an investigation into the debunked conspiracy theory that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton.$878$ To the contrary, the U.S. Intelligence Community unanimously assessed that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump, as did Special Counsel Robert Mueller.$879$

In a November 18 letter to House Republicans, Senator Johnson confirmed the accuracy of the Wall Street Journal's account of his August 30 call with Ambassador Sondland.$880$

Ambassador Sondland testified that he had "no reason to dispute" Senator Johnson's recollection of the August 30 call and testified that by late August 2019, he had concluded that "if Ukraine did something to demonstrate a serious intention to fight corruption, and specifically addressing Burisma and the 2016, then the hold on military aid would be lifted."$881$